Non-EU landlords and deductions: what the 2025 ruling actually changed

Short answer
Nothing yet, officially. But it may be worth protecting your position. The Audiencia Nacional held in 2025 that refusing deductions to a non-EU landlord may breach the free movement of capital, which unlike most EU freedoms also protects third countries. The decision is under appeal, so the safe assumption remains that you cannot deduct.

This is orientation on a live legal question, not advice. If it might apply to you, it is a conversation with a Spanish adviser, and it is time-sensitive.

Rates db@2026-07-22 · effective Jul 22, 2026Every figure on this page comes from that dated table.

What the argument is

EU and EEA landlords deduct their costs; non-EU landlords are taxed on gross rent. Most EU freedoms only protect members, which is why the difference has stood.

The free movement of capital is the exception: it applies to movements between member states and third countries too. The argument is that taxing a third-country landlord on a base a resident landlord never faces is a restriction on that freedom.

The 2025 decision accepted that argument. It is one court, it is under appeal, and it is not the settled position.

The decision: Audiencia Nacional 3630/2025 (28-07-2025)

On 12,000 a yearAs applied todayIf deductions were allowed
Rent received€12,000€12,000
Deductible costsnone allowed€4,000
Taxed on€12,000€8,000
Tax€2,880€1,920

Same landlord, same flat, same year. The left column is what you file on now; the right is what the argument would produce if it is upheld.

Why the timing matters

A claim is not open indefinitely. If the position is eventually confirmed, only the years still inside the correction window can be reclaimed, and a year that has aged out is gone whatever the courts decide later.

Spanish filings can generally be corrected for 4 years, so each year that passes takes the oldest one out of reach.

That is the whole practical point: waiting for certainty may cost you the earliest years you could have recovered.

What this does and does not mean

It does not mean you should file as though deductions are allowed. Filing on an unsettled position invites a correction and a surcharge.

What advisers commonly discuss is filing correctly and separately protecting the position for the open years, so that if it is confirmed the claim exists rather than having lapsed.

How Yald shows it

Where the ruling could apply, the analysis shows both figures: the enforced position you file on today, and what it would be if deductions were allowed. The enforced one is the headline, because that is what you owe now.

Both carry the reference and the caveat that it is not final, because a number without that context would be misleading.

Common questions

Does this apply to a UK landlord?
The UK is a third country since Brexit, so the argument is the same one. Whether it succeeds is not yet settled.
Should I stop paying on gross rent?
No. The position as applied is unchanged. Filing otherwise risks a correction plus surcharges.
How far back could a claim reach?
Spanish filings can generally be corrected for four years. Older years fall away regardless of the outcome.
What would I actually do about it?
Speak to a Spanish tax adviser about whether protecting the open years is proportionate for the amounts involved. Yald shows you the size of the difference; it does not file anything.

Estimate for orientation only - not tax, legal or financial advice. Figures are computed from versioned, dated reference rates and may be incomplete or out of date. Confirm with your gestor / asesor fiscal.